Consent Laws
Maine
Last Updated: April 2023
Defining Consent | Answer |
How is consent defined? |
“Consent” means a word or action by a person that indicates a freely given agreement. 17-A MRSA § 251. |
Does the definition require "freely given consent" or "affirmative consent"? |
Yes. “Consent” means a word or action by a person that indicates a freely given agreement. 17-A MRSA § 251. |
Capacity to Consent | Answer |
At what age is a person able to consent? |
16 years old. 17-A M.R.S.A. 254. |
Does difference in age between the victim and actor impact the victim's ability to consent? |
Yes. A person is guilty of sexual abuse of a minor if the person engages in a sexual act with another person, not the actor’s spouse, where:
17-A M.R.S.A. 254. A person is guilty of unlawful sexual contact if the actor intentionally subjects another person who is not their spouse to any sexual contact where:
17-A M.R.S.A.255-A A person is guilty of unlawful sexual touching if the actor intentionally subjects another person who is not their spouse to any sexual touching where:
17-A M.R.S.A. 260. |
Does elderly age impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. A person is guilty of a sex crime if that person engages in a “sexual act/contact/touching” with another person and the actor is employed to provide care to a dependent person, who is not the actor's spouse or domestic partner and who is unable to perform self-care because of advanced age or physical or mental disease, disorder or defect. 17-A M.R.S.A. 253, 255-A, 260. |
Does developmental disability and/or mental incapacity impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. A person is guilty of a sex crime if that person engages in a “sexual act/contact/touching” with another person and:
Mental disability can be either “reasonably apparent” or “known to the actor” and thus the statute allows for either “subjective awareness or an objective manifestation of the required disability.” State v. Chabot, 478 A.2d 1136, 1138 (Maine 1984). |
Does physical disability, incapacity or helplessness impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. A person is guilty of a sex crime if that person engages in a “sexual act/contact/touching” with another person and:
|
Does consciousness impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. A person is guilty of a sex crime if that person engages in a “sexual act/contact/touching” with another person and the other person is unconscious or otherwise physically incapable of resisting and has not consented to the sexual act. 17-A M.R.S.A. 253, 255-A, 260. |
Does intoxication impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. A person is guilty of a sex crime if that person engages in a “sexual act” with another person and the actor has substantially impaired the other person's power to appraise or control the other person's sexual acts by furnishing, administering or employing drugs, intoxicants or other similar means. 17-A M.R.S.A. 253. Please note that the above only applies if the perpetrator provides the intoxicants to the victim, but says nothing about instances in which the victim voluntarily consumed alcohol, that was not provided by the perpetrator, prior to the assault. |
Does the relationship between the victim and actor impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes.
|
Defenses | Answer |
Is consent a defense to sex crimes? |
Yes, but consent is not a defense to sex crime of having carnal knowledge of female between 14 and 16. State v. Morang, 132 Me. 443, 172 A. 431 (Me., 1934). Consent is also not a defense to charge of taking indecent liberties with the sexual organs of certain minors. State v Deveau, 354 A.2d 389 (Me. 1976). Consent is not a defense if: (1) it is given by a person who, by reason of intoxication, physical illness, mental illness or mental defect, including, but not limited to, dementia and other cognitive impairments, or youth, is manifestly unable, or known by the defendant to be unable, to make a reasonable judgment as to the nature or harmfulness of the conduct charged to constitute the crime; or (2) it is induced by force, duress or deception or undue influence. 17A M.R.S.A. § 109. |
Is voluntary intoxication a defense to sex crimes? |
It depends on whether the crime requires a person to intentionally or knowingly commit a crime. For example, the crime of unlawful sexual contact requires proof that that defendant “intentionally” subjects another person to any sexual contact; since the defendant could not have been found guilty of the crime unless he acted intentionally, voluntary intoxication is a valid defense. State v. Crocker, 387 A.2d 26, 27 (Me. 1978). See also State v. Keaten, 390 A.2d 1043, 1044 (Me. 1978) (the crime of gross sexual misconduct neither explicitly or implicitly required proof of intent or knowledge, and consequently, voluntary intoxication did not constitute a valid defense to that crime). |