Consent Laws
Massachusetts
Last Updated: April 2023
| Defining Consent | Answer |
How is consent defined? |
Consent is not specifically defined. The standard in the sexual assault statutes is whether the accused compels the victim to submit by force and against his or her will, or compels such person to submit by threat of bodily injury. Mass. Gen. Laws. Ann. Ch. 265 §22. |
Does the definition require "freely given consent" or "affirmative consent"? |
Not specified. |
| Capacity to Consent | Answer |
At what age is a person able to consent? |
16 to 18 years old depending on the crime below.
|
Does difference in age between the victim and actor impact the victim's ability to consent? |
Difference in age may impact the punishment for the defendant but does not impact the ability of the victim to consent. Whoever unlawfully has sexual intercourse or unnatural sexual intercourse with a child under 16, and (a) there exists more than a 5 year age difference between the defendant and victim and the victim is under 12 or (b) there exists more than a 10 year age difference between the defendant and the victim and the victim is between 12 and 16, shall be punished by imprisonment for a minimum of ten years. Mass. Gen. Laws. Ann. ch. 265, §23A. |
Does elderly age impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
No. However, the punishment for indecent assault and battery on an elder (a person sixty years of age or older) is more severe. Mass. Gen. Laws. Ann. ch. 265, §13H. A person over the age of sixty is deemed incapable of consent to sexual contact with a law enforcement officer while the person is under detention. Mass. Gen. Laws. Ann. ch. 265, §13H 1/2. |
Does developmental disability and/or mental incapacity impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes, if the victim was incapable of consenting due to such developmental disability and/or mental incapacity. Com. v. Fuller, 845 N.E.2d 434, 66 Mass.App.Ct. 84 (2006). The punishment for indecent assault and battery on a person with a disability (a person with a permanent or long-term physical or mental impairment that prevents or restricts the individual’s ability to provide for his or her own care or protection) is more severe. Mass. Gen. Laws. Ann. ch. 265, §13H and §13K (defining “person with a disability”). A person known to a law enforcement officer as having an intellectual or physical disability is deemed incapable of consent to sexual contact with a law enforcement officer while the person is under detention. Mass. Gen. Laws. Ann. ch. 265, §13H 1/2. |
Does physical disability, incapacity or helplessness impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
See above. |
Does consciousness impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes, if the victim is so impaired as to be incapable of consenting to intercourse. Com. v. Blache, 880 N.E.2d 736, 743, 450 Mass. 583, 592 (2008). |
Does intoxication impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes, if such intoxication renders the person incapable of giving consent. Com. v. Urban, 880 N.E.2d 753, 450 Mass. 608 (2008). Fact of intoxication, by itself, does not necessarily mean that an individual is incapable of deciding whether to assent to a sexual encounter. Id. |
Does the relationship between the victim and actor impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
No. However, it is aggravated statutory rape (which carries a harsher punishment) for a person that is a “mandated reporter” at the time of the act to have sexual intercourse or unnatural sexual intercourse with a child under 16 years of age. Mass. Gen. Laws. Ann. ch. 265, §23A. “Mandated reporter” means a person who is:
Mass. Gen. Laws. Ann. ch. 119, §21. |
| Defenses | Answer |
Is consent a defense to sex crimes? |
Under indictment charging rape, the prosecution has the affirmative duty to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that sexual intercourse was performed against the will of the victim and without consent, and consent is therefore an issue in every rape prosecution for intercourse to which victim could have legally consented, even where defendant denies that intercourse involving him has taken place. Com. v. Chretien, 417 N.E.2d 1203, 383 Mass. 123 (1981). Consent is not a defense to statutory rape; it is a strict liability crime. Com. v. Knap, 592 N.E.2d 747, 412 Mass. 712 (1992). |
Is voluntary intoxication a defense to sex crimes? |
No. Diminished capacity resulting from the voluntary use of intoxicating liquor is not a defense to rape. Com. v. Rahilly, 410 N.E.2d 1223, 10 Mass.App.Ct. 911 (1980). |