Consent Laws
Maryland
Last Updated: April 2023
Defining Consent | Answer |
How is consent defined? |
Consent is not specifically defined. However, Maryland law provides that a person commits a sex crime if that person engages in “vaginal intercourse” or “sexual act” with another:
“Mentally incapacitated individual” means an individual who, because of the influence of a drug, narcotic, or intoxicating substance, or because of an act committed on the individual without the individual’s consent or awareness, is rendered substantially incapable of:
“Physically helpless individual” means an individual who:
“Substantially cognitively impaired individual” means an individual who suffers from an intellectual disability or a mental disorder, either of which temporarily or permanently renders the individual substantially incapable of:
Maryland law also provides that a person may not engage in sexual contact with another:
See also: In the case of a conscious and competent victim, mere passivity on the victim’s part will not establish the absence of consent. The law looks for express negation or implicit negation as evidenced by some degree of physical resistance or an explanation of why the will to resist was overcome by force or fear of harm. Travis v. State, 218 Md. App. 410, 428, 98 A.3d 281, 291 (2014). It is well settled that the terms “against the will” and “without the consent” are synonymous in the law of rape. State v. Rusk, 289 Md. 230, 241, 424 A.2d 720, 725 (1981). Given the fact that consent must precede penetration, it follows in our view that although a woman may have consented to a sexual encounter, even to intercourse, if that consent is withdrawn prior to the act of penetration, then it cannot be said that she has consented to sexual intercourse. On the other hand, ordinarily if she consents prior to penetration and withdraws the consent following penetration, there is no rape. Battle v. State, 287 Md. 675, 684, 414 A.2d 1266, 1270 (1980). |
Does the definition require "freely given consent" or "affirmative consent"? |
No. |
Capacity to Consent | Answer |
At what age is a person able to consent? |
16 years old. MD Code, Criminal Law, § 3-308. |
Does difference in age between the victim and actor impact the victim's ability to consent? |
Yes. A person that is under the age of 14 can engage in consensual sexual activity with a person that is less than 4 years older. Also, a person that is 14 or 15 years old can engage in consensual sexual activity with a person that is less than 4 years older. MD Code, Criminal Law, § 3-304(a)(3); 3-307(a)(3)-(4); 3-308(b)(2)-(3). |
Does elderly age impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
No. |
Does developmental disability and/or mental incapacity impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. A person may not engage in “vaginal intercourse,” a “sexual act,” or “sexual contact” with another if the victim is a substantially cognitively impaired or a mentally incapacitated individual, and the person performing the act knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a substantially cognitively impaired or mentally incapacitated individual. MD Code, Criminal Law, § 3-304; 3-307. See also Boyd v. State, 2015 WL 5945316 (Md. App 2015) (“[the] individual is mentally defective when he or she suffers from a mental disability that renders him or her substantially incapable of ‘appraising the nature of the individual's conduct’”). |
Does physical disability, incapacity or helplessness impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. A person may not engage in “vaginal intercourse,” a “sexual act,” or “sexual contact” with another if the victim is a physically helpless individual and the person performing the act knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a physically helpless individual. MD Code, Criminal Law, § 3-304; 3-307. |
Does consciousness impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. A person may not engage in “vaginal intercourse,” a “sexual act,” or “sexual contact” with another if the victim is a substantially cognitively impaired individual or mentally incapacitated individual and the person performing the act knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a substantially cognitively impaired or mentally incapacitated individual. MD Code, Criminal Law, § 3-304; 3-307. |
Does intoxication impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. A person may not engage in “vaginal intercourse,” a “sexual act,” or “sexual contact” with another if the victim is a mentally incapacitated individual, and the person performing the act knows or reasonably should know that the victim is a mentally incapacitated individual. MD Code, Criminal Law, § 3-304; 3-307 |
Does the relationship between the victim and actor impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. Age of consent law applies differently if the actor is a teacher or other school employee who is in a position of authority over the other person. Such persons may not engage in sexual activity with school students. MD Code, Criminal Law, § 3-308. A correctional employee (and other related employees such as an employee of a contractor providing goods and services to a correctional facility) may not engage in “sexual contact,” “vaginal intercourse,” or a “sexual act” with an inmate. MD Code, Criminal Law, § 3-314. A person may also not engage in “sexual contact,” “vaginal intercourse,” or a “sexual act” with an individual confined in a child care institution licensed by the Department of Juvenile Services, a detention center for juveniles, or a facility for juveniles. MD Code, Criminal Law, § 3-314. A person may not be prosecuted for rape in the first degree, rape in the second degree, sexual offense in the third degree, or sexual offense in the fourth degree against a victim who was the person’s legal spouse at the time of the alleged rape or sexual offense. MD Code, Criminal Law, § 3-318. There are exceptions for separation or use of force and limited divorce. MD Code, Criminal Law, § 3-318. |
Defenses | Answer |
Is consent a defense to sex crimes? |
Yes, but not as to a charge of statutory rape. “We decline to deviate from the majority rule and uphold the legislature’s intent, as determined in Garnett, to make statutory rape a strict liability crime.” Owens v. State, 352 Md. 663, 688, 724 A.2d 43, 55 (1999). |
Is voluntary intoxication a defense to sex crimes? |
Yes, voluntary intoxication of the actor is a defense to sex crimes under certain circumstances. See Holt v. State, 438 A.2d 1386, 50 Md. App. 578 (1982) (failure of trial court to give requested instruction on voluntary intoxication mandated reversal of defendant’s convictions for specific intent crimes of third-degree sexual offense and attempted third-degree sexual offense). |