Consent Laws
District of Columbia
Last Updated: 2026
| Defining Consent | Answer |
How is consent defined? |
“Consent” means words or overt actions indicating a freely given agreement to the sexual act or contact in question. Lack of verbal or physical resistance or submission by the victim, resulting from the use of force, threats, or coercion by the defendant shall not constitute consent. D.C. Code § 22-3001(4). “Force” means the use or threatened use of a weapon; the use of such physical strength or violence as is sufficient to overcome, restrain, or injure a person; or the use of a threat of harm sufficient to coerce or compel submission by the victim. D.C. Code § 22-3001(5). |
Does the definition require "freely given consent" or "affirmative consent"? |
Yes. Consent to the sexual act or contact in question must be freely given agreement. D.C. Code § 22-3001(4). |
| Capacity to Consent | Answer |
At what age is a person able to consent? |
16 years old. D.C. Code § 22-3001(3). |
Does difference in age between the victim and actor impact the victim's ability to consent? |
Yes.
“Significant relationship” includes:
|
Does elderly age impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
No. |
Does developmental disability and/or mental incapacity impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. A person is unable to consent to engaging in a sexual act or sexual contact if such person is (A) incapable of appraising the nature of the conduct, (B) incapable of declining participation in that sexual act or sexual contact; or (C) incapable of communicating unwillingness to engage in that sexual act or sexual contact. D.C. Code §§ 22-3003(2)(A)-(C), 22-3005(2)(A)-(C). |
Does physical disability, incapacity or helplessness impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. A person is unable to consent to engaging in a sexual act or sexual contact if such person is:
D.C. Code §§ 22-3003(2)(B)-(C), 22-3005(2)(B)-(C). |
Does consciousness impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. A person is unable to consent to engaging in a sexual act or sexual contact if such person is:
D.C. Code §§ 22-3003(2)(A)-(C), 22-3005(2)(A)-(C). |
Does intoxication impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. A victim’s ability to consent is impacted by his/her intoxication due to a drug, intoxicant, or other similar substance that substantially impairs the ability of the victim to appraise or control his or her conduct, administered by the accused to the victim by force or threat of force, or without the knowledge or permission of the victim. D.C. Code § 22-3002, 22-3004(4). |
Does the relationship between the victim and actor impact the victim’s ability to consent? |
Yes. Sexual Abuse of a Minor:
“Significant relationship” includes:
Sexual Abuse of a Secondary Education Student:
Sexual Abuse of a Ward, Patient, Client, Arrestee, Detainee or Prisoner:
Sexual Abuse of a Patient or Client:
D.C. Code §§ 22–3015, 22-3016. Marriage or domestic partnership between the defendant and the child or minor at the time of the offense is a defense, which the defendant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence, to a prosecution for child sexual abuse, enticing a child or minor, or sexual abuse of a minor under D.C. Code §§ 22-3008 to 22-3010.01, prosecuted alone or in conjunction with attempted sexual abuse under D.C. Code § 22-3018 or § 22-403, involving only the defendant and the child or minor. D.C. Code § 22–3011. |
| Defenses | Answer |
Is consent a defense to sex crimes? |
Yes. Consent by the victim is a defense to sex crimes (including attempted sexual abuse under D.C. Code §§ 22–3018 or 22-401 & 22-403) other than crimes involving:
D.C. Code §§ 22–3007, 22–3011. |
Is voluntary intoxication a defense to sex crimes? |
No. |